Limitations in validating emergency department triage scales

Validity indicators including sensitivity (Se), specificity, positive predictive value and negative predictive value (NPV) were used to estimate the validity.Associated percentages for over-/under-triage were used to further assess practical application of the paediatric SATS. The percentage of hospital admissions increased with an increase in the level of urgency from 5% in the non-urgent patients to 73% in the emergency patients.Their baseline demographics are presented in Table 1.The triage acuity level with the highest number of participants was the non-urgent category, representing 44.2% of the study population; the emergency category had the lowest number of participants (180 children), representing 9.9%.A total of 443 children (21.5%) were admitted and 1 450 (72.0%) were discharged.Of the children, 1 881 were included in the sensitivity analyses shown in Table 2 and Figs 2 - 4; 133 data forms were excluded, as 40 (2.1%) had no documentation of disposition, 6 (0.3%) were lacking information on the triage acuity level, 5 (0.3%) had incomplete TEWS calculations, 1 patient died, and 81 patients (4.0%) were referred and could not be followed up. Comparing sensitivity, specificity, over-triage, under-triage, and positive and negative predictive values when using clinical signs or TEWS in isolation as opposed to in combination as the SATS TEWS = Triage Early Warning Score; SATS = South African Triage Scale; Se = sensitivity; Sp = specificity; OT = over-triage; UT = under-triage; PPV = positive predictive value; NPV = negative predictive value.

1 Most are based on a list of clinical discriminators; some include individual vital signs, while others include early warning scores (EWSs) or symptom-based algorithms.

The data demonstrated that sensitivity increased substantially when using the SATS, which is a combination of clinical discriminators and the Triage Early Warning Score (TEWS) (Se 91.0%, NPV 95.3%), compared with use of clinical discriminators in isolation (Se 57.1%, NPV 86.3%) or the TEWS in isolation (Se 75.6%, NPV 89.1%).

Emergency centre (EC) triage should enable rapid prioritisation of paediatric patients to determine how urgently children require care.

those children triaged to the lowest category are genuinely non-urgent cases).

The paediatric SATS has been shown to have an Se of 91% and an NPV of 95.3%, which demonstrates that it has an excellent ability to identify seriously ill children when admission is used as a marker for urgency.

At each site one shift of nurses was trained to use the revised paediatric SATS.

Please or register to post comments
If spammers comment on your content, only you can see and manage such comments Delete all
MANAGEMENT OF PATIENTS IN EMERGENCY CENTRES. Triage Scales are. Limitations in validating emergency department triage scales. Emerg Med J. 2007; 24 477. 
15-Nov-2018 01:09
Reply
Triage Notes - Download as Word. for all incoming patients.2. introduced paramedic triage in its Emergency Department. Limitations in Validating Emergency. 
15-Nov-2018 01:12
Reply
Triage in children. Triage scales in the emergency department. Limitations in validating emergency department triage scales. 
15-Nov-2018 01:15
Reply
Objective To assess the validity of the South African Triage. The main study limitations. Limitations in validating emergency department triage scales. 
15-Nov-2018 01:19
Reply
LIMITATIONS IN VALIDATING EMERGENCY DEPARTMENT TRIAGE SCALES. Current methods of triage scale assessment and their limitations. 
15-Nov-2018 01:24
Reply

Limitations in validating emergency department triage scales introduction

Limitations in validating emergency department triage scales

Recent posts

15-Nov-2018 07:16
15-Nov-2018 14:42
15-Nov-2018 20:03
15-Nov-2018 23:16
16-Nov-2018 07:20
16-Nov-2018 14:25